Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 02:32

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Davante Adams feels rejuvenated: Joining Rams was "exactly what I needed" - NBC Sports
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Procter & Gamble says it will cut 7,000 jobs over the next 2 years - CBS News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What do you respect the most about Elon Musk?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Do foreign workers face discrimination in Canada?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?